APCD Hearing Board Agenda – June 6, 2018

June 6, 2018

Agenda  |  Public Notice  |  Meeting Audio

Call to Order – Roll Call
Approval of minutes of the February 7, 2018 meeting
Requests for continuance or addition of Ex-Agenda items
Announcements/Staff Reports
Public Comment Period 

Public Hearings 

1)     Case No. 2018-05-R (Regular Variance) – ExxonMobil Production Company, 12000 Calle Real, Goleta, CA 93117
Petition  |  Staff Report  |  Draft Variance

Hearing – To consider an application by ExxonMobil Production Company submitted on May 03, 2018 for a Regular Variance from District Rule 206, Conditions 9.C.17, 9.C.18, 9.C.36, 9.C.40, and 9.C.41 of Part 70/Permit to Operate 5651. The Petitioner operates the equipment described in this Petition at the Las Flores Canyon oil and gas processing plant, approximately 25 miles northwest of Santa Barbara, CA.

2)     Case No. 2018-06-R (Regular Variance) – ExxonMobil Production Company, 12000 Calle Real, Goleta, CA 93117
Petition  |  Staff Report  |  Draft Variance

Hearing – To consider an application by ExoonMobil Production Company submitted on May 03, 2018 for a Regular Variance from District Rule 206, Conditions 9.C.13, 9.C.14, 9.C.16, and 9.C.35 of Part 70/Permit to Operate 8092. The Petitioner operates the equipment described in this Petition at the POPCO gas processing plant, approximately 25 miles northwest of Santa Barbara, CA.

3)     Case No. – 2017-21-AP – Wine Institute, 425 Market Street, Suite 1000, San Francisco, CA 94105
Additional information regarding wineries can be found on this page.

Update on Settlement Negotiations and Request to Continue Hearing to a Future Date

09/14/2017 Petition | Exhibit A | Exhibit B | Exhibit C | Exhibit D | Exhibit E

10/23/2017 District Answer to Petition | Exhibit 1 | Exhibit 2 | Exhibit 3 | Exhibit 4 | Exhibit 5 | Exhibit 6 | Exhibit 7 | Exhibit 8 | Exhibit 9 | Exhibit 10

12/13/2017 Stipulation and Order 

01/09/2018 Petitioner Opening Brief | Exhibit 1 | Exhibit 2 | Exhibit 3 | Exhibit 4 | Exhibit 5 | Exhibit 6 | Exhibit 7 | Exhibit 8 | Exhibit 9 | Exhibit 10 | Exhibit 11 | Exhibit 12 |Exhibit 13 | Exhibit 14 | Exhibit 15 | Exhibit 16 | Exhibit 17 | Exhibit 18 | Exhibit 19 | Exhibit 20 | Exhibit 21 | Exhibit 22 | Exhibit 23 | Exhibit 24 | Exhibit 25 | Exhibit 26 | Exhibit 27 | Exhibit 28 | Exhibit 29 | Exhibit 30 | Exhibit 31 | Exhibit 32 | Exhibit 33 | Exhibit 34 | Exhibit 35 | Exhibit 36 | Exhibit 37 | Exhibit 38 | Exhibit 39 | Exhibit 40 | Exhibit 41 | Exhibit 42 | Exhibit 43 | Exhibit 44 | Exhibit 45 | Exhibit 46 | Exhibit 47 | Documentary Evidence in Support of Petitioner Petition for Review

02/26/18 District Response to Brief | Exhibit 1 | Exhibit 2 | Exhibit 3 | Exhibit 4 | Exhibit 5 | Exhibit 6 | Exhibit 7 | Exhibit 8 | Exhibit 9 | Exhibit 10 | Exhibit 11 | Exhibit 12 | Exhibit 13 | Exhibit 14 | Exhibit 15 | Exhibit 16 | Exhibit 17 | Exhibit 18 | Exhibit 19 | Exhibit 20 | Exhibit 21 | Exhibit 22 | Exhibit 23 | Exhibit 24 | Exhibit 25 | Exhibit 26 | Exhibit 27 | Exhibit 28 | Exhibit 29 | Exhibit 30 | Exhibit 31 | Exhibit 32 | Exhibit 33 | Exhibit 34 | Exhibit 35 | Exhibit 36 | Exhibit 37 | Exhibit 38 | Exhibit 39 | Exhibit 40 | Exhibit 41 | Exhibit 42 | Exhibit 43 | Exhibit 44 | Exhibit 45 | Exhibit 46

03/13/18 Petitioner Reply Brief 

03/13/18 Public Comment – California Air Resources Board | Technical Support Attachment | Exhibit 1 | Exhibit 2 | Exhibit 3 | Exhibit 4 | Exhibit 5 | Exhibit 6

03/15/18 Attorney Emails Regarding Public Comment from California Air Resources Board (Attorney for PetitionerAttorney for DistrictAttorney for California Air Resources Board)

04/17/18 District Letter in Response to Public Comment from California Air Resources Board

04/18/18 Petitioner Letter in Response to Public Comment from California Air Resources Board

04/26/18 Order of Continuance

Hearing Continued from May 2, 2018 – To consider a petition submitted on September 15, 2017 by the Wine Institute requesting a public hearing pursuant to California Health and Safety Code section 42302.1 for review of Final Authority to Construct No. 15044 issued to Central Coast Wine Services for modifications to its winery located at 2717 Aviation Way, Santa Maria, California. Petitioner is requesting the District Hearing Board review and determine whether the permit was properly issued as it relates to whether requirements for emissions control requirements for reactive organic compound emissions from wine fermentation tanks have been “achieved in practice” and therefore qualify as Best Available Control Technology

4)     Case No. – 2017-24-AP – Wine Institute, 425 Market Street, Suite 1000, San Francisco, CA 94105
Additional information regarding wineries can be found on this page.

Update on Settlement Negotiations and Request to Continue Hearing to a Future Date

10/10/2017 Petition | Exhibit A | Exhibit B | Exhibit C | Exhibit D | Exhibit E | Exhibit F

All other items for Case No. – 2017-24-AP are the same as those for Case No. – 2017-21-AP and can be found under Agenda Item 1 above (District Answer to Petition, Stipulation and Proposed Order, Petitioner Opening Brief and Exhibits 1-46, District Response to Brief and Exhibits 1-46, Petitioner Reply Brief, Public Comment – California Air Resources Board, Attorney Emails Regarding Public Comment from California Air Resources Board, District Letter in Response to Public Comment from California Air Resources Board, and Petitioner Letter in Response to Public Comment from California Air Resources Board)

Hearing Continued from May 2, 2018 – To consider a petition submitted on October 11, 2017 by the Wine Institute requesting a public hearing pursuant to California Health and Safety Code section 42302.1 for review of Final Authority to Construct No. 15044-01 issued to Central Coast Wine Services for modifications to its winery located at 2717 Aviation Way, Santa Maria, California. Petitioner is requesting the District Hearing Board review and determine whether the permit was properly issued as it relates to whether requirements for emissions control requirements for reactive organic compound emissions from wine fermentation tanks have been “achieved in practice” and therefore qualify as Best Available Control Technology. Petitioner is also requesting this petition be consolidated into Hearing Board Case No. 2017-21-AP, as they are nearly identical.

VII. – Motion to reschedule the July 2018 regular meeting of the Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District Hearing Board from July 4, 2018 to another date in July.

Adjourn